By Chris Winter. 25 March 2025

Far more errors are found on the home pages of websites that don’t have an Accessibility Statement than those that do. Image courtesy of The Dunham Group

An Accessibility Statement informs users about the accessibility of a website. The absence of an Accessibility Statement is a warning that the website may have poor accessibility. Furthermore, the websites owner may care little about the needs of disabled people.

I have subjectively observed that the home pages of those websites without Accessibility Statements typically have a greater number of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) conformance errors. I decided to quantify my anecdotal observation.

During the recent past I have evaluated a 200 home pages using the WebAIM WAVE tool. In addition, I have manually recorded the existence of an Accessibility Statement for those websites evaluated. In all honesty the disparity in the average number of WCAG conformance errors surprised me:

  • Home pages with an Accessibility Statement average 13.4 errors
  • Home pages without an Accessibility Statement average 180.8 errors

From this I have concluded that the absence of an Accessibility Statement is not an absolute but it is a strong indication that a website is not very accessible and users may choose not to proceed.

Through the execution of my work in this area, I have discovered some misuse of Accessibility Statements, examples follow:

  • Accessibility statements have described the accessibility to physical sites.
  • Accessibility statements have been used to promote the accessibility professional services provided by companies.

I have not named and shamed organisations for their misuse of Accessibility Statements.

There is a great deal of readily available information on Accessibility Statements on the web. Here are some examples:

[Note from Archives of IT. We do not have an accessibility statement on our website at the moment but we are planning to make our website more accessible in the future and will include such a statement. We appreciate Chris’s continued diligence in matters of digital accessibility.]

My Previous blogs for AIT:

 

About the author

Chris Winter FIET FBCS CITP is an Advocate for the Digital Poverty Alliance, an evangelist for digital accessibility and a former IBM Fellow, now retired.

About the Digital Poverty Alliance (DPA)

The DPA defines Digital Poverty with five key determinants: the affordability of devices and connectivity, accessibility (for the disabled), skills, motivation and a lack of ongoing support. With the breadth of digital poverty being so broad. Its objective is to eradicate digital poverty in the UK by 2030.